Setup (9) Second Plant Survey – 2024 (How are we tracking?)

On June 11th 2024, almost a year after the first (winter 2023) plant survey, Dr. David Tucker and Dr. Gab Lebbink undertook the second botanical survey on site – using three established transects that crossed the passive regeneration artwork site, and one end of the newly named wetland artwork site.  The vegetation types had now shifted from a recently mowed winter site back in 2023 (following a dry season and pre-burn) to a now actively regenerating area after extensive rain – which had also long recovered from its winter 2023 burning.

We surveyed the site along the three prior transects – with each of the 5 sites along each transect marked by a ground peg installed in 2023.

Plant transects and quadrat sites for botanical survey (approx.) (Image Keith Armstrong)
Botanical Survey transect (with tape measure on the ground) running across survey site, June 11th, 2024 (Image Keith Armstrong)

An ecologists’ quadrat (1x 1m) was laid at each pegged point (see diagram above) and estimates of ground cover (% ) and lists of species recorded. As before the agreement on the floristic content was negotiated through  a wonderful, gentle dialogue between the two ecologists – a soundtrack I again recorded a part of for use in a future artwork – just as I had used it the artwork Analog Intelligence. Next  a 5x5m square, originating from that quadrat point at each peg was surveyed for tree growth – with species names, counts and heights recorded. These figures therefore gave us an estimate across the entire site of vegetation type, quality and mix.

Typical bare plot from initial survey in June 2023 – with young trees marked with tape (Image Gabrielle Lebbink)
Typical rich plot from second survey in June 2024 – Dr. Gabrielle Lebbink laying down a quadrat at the second site plant survey, June 11th, 2024 (Image Keith Armstrong)
A plethora of life in the renewing forest/grassland (Image Keith Armstrong)

As a result, the plots were each quite dense and broadly speaking the number of trees had generally grown well (although some had been lost in the 2023 burn, the very wet summer – or possibly were also hidden in the long grasses and forbs).

Re-growth of trees now evident everywhere at the site, Botanical survey day, 11/6/24 (Image Keith Armstrong)
Dr. David Tucker and Dr. Gabrielle Lebbink working in the field at the second site plant survey, June 11th, 2024
Dr. Gabrielle Lebbink at the second site plant survey, June 11th, 2024 (Image Keith Armstrong)
A plethora of life in the renewing forest/grassland, June 2024 (Image Keith Armstrong)

In due course, the results of the survey will be collated and compared – which will tell us about the practical progression of the project’s science/ecological meta-aims – i.e. to regrow a native forest from a cleared block – whilst allowing the natural intelligence  of the forest and all its constituent species to direct that progress, and with minimal intervention.

Scene from the artwork ‘Analog Intelligence, 2024’ that suggests the nascent forest returning to the artwork site (Image Keith Armstrong)

Comparative Surveys 

Here is how the site had progressed ny 11/6/24  (or regressed in some cases since the initial survey – which was followed by a burn). There had certainly been some significant changes with some problematic weeds decreased ) e.g. Paspalum urvillei – and at that stage the field still had end of the epic native Fimbristylis spp. crop!

Life Form Key (Perrenial/Annual P/A     Graminoid/Forb G/F.   Shrub/Climber S/C)
# Species Provenance Life
Form
1707
23
1106
24
1 Cynodon dactylon Exotic PG Y Y  
2 Digitaria spp. Exotic PG Y (*1) Y
3 Centella asiatica Native PF Y Y  
4 Hypochaeris radiata Exotic PF Y Y  
5 Imperata cylindrica Native PG Y Y  
6 Fimbristylis spp.   PG Y N  
7 Ageratum houstonianum Exotic PF Y Y  
8 Sporobolus spp creber Native PG Y Y  
9 Bidens pilosa Exotic AF Y Y  
10 Polygala paniculata Exotic AF Y Y  
11 Eragrostis brownii Native PG Y Y  
12 Arundinella nepalensis Native PG Y Y  
13 Alloteropsis semialata Native PG Y N  
14 Lobelia purpurascens Native PF Y Y  
15 Sonchus oleraceus Exotic AF Y Y  
16 Paspalum notatum Exotic PG Y Y  
17 Eremochloa bimaculata Native PG Y Y  
18 Wahlenbergia gracilis Native AF Y N  
19 Epaltes australis Native PF Y N  
20 Schenkia australis Native AF Y N  
21 Melinis repens Exotic PG Y Y  
22 Velleia spathulata Native PF Y Y  
23 Polygala spp Native   Y N  
24 Phyllanthus virgatus Native AF Y Y  
25 Cheilanthes sieberi Native PF Y Y  
26 Paspalum urvillei Exotic PG Y N *2
27 Apiaceae spp Exotic PF Y*3 Y
28 Cymbopogon refractus Native PG Y Y  
29 Phyllanthus spp big     Y N  
30 Lantana camara Exotic S Y Y  
31 Dianella caerulea Native PG Y Y  
32 Parsonsia straminea Native C Y Y  
33 Passiflora suberosa Exotic C Y N  
34 Senna pendula Exotic S Y Y  
35 Lomandra multiflora Native PG Y N  
36 Drosera spathulata Native AF Y Y  
37 Aristida queenslandicum Native PG Y N  
38 Leucopogon juniperinus Native S Y N  
39 Gomphrena celesoides Exotic PF Y N  
40 Setaria sphacelata Exotic PG N Y  
41 Sauropus hirtellus Native PF N Y  
42 Scleria sp. Native PG N Y  
43 Schoenus sp. Native PG N Y  
44 Cyanthillium cinereum Native PF N Y  
45 Cyperus sp.   PG N Y  
46 Desmodium sp. Native PF N Y  
47 Hypericum gramineum     N Y*4
48 Panicum repens Exotic PG N/Y Y*5  

Notes
*1 Awaiting seed head to confirm and id to species. Maybe D. violascens

*2 Was originally Big weed paspalum (2023)

*3 Maybe Ranunculus inundates

*4 Needs further identification

*5 Needs further identification; identified in 2023 as Cynodon dactylon in wetland area

Leave a Reply